Dmitri Zagidulin: Software engineer in decentralized identity and credential space. Co-chair of SDS, written various did resolvers in node and part of possibly way to many standards bodies. ✪
Manu Sporny: It is like a tool kit for folks working on VCs and charters have expired at W3C task force - we need to hit a button to bring them back to life we can believe they are more done when VCs ✪
Manu Sporny: If the group feels we should continue this work we can or just let fade away ✪
Wayne Chang: Took me a while to get on, so hopefully I didn't miss the update portion [scribe assist by Daniel Buchner] ✪
Christopher Allen: Question for manu - blockchain commons looked into potentially using these - these are hashes main use. IPFS never moved on to keys they have been promising that for 4 years we gave up on this. we have moved to CBOR where we are being more productive working with existing libraries. ✪
Christopher Allen: Coding hashes with CBOR and IPFS. ✪
Manu Sporny: ChristopherA CBOR doesn't solve the problem - ORIE has gotten more keys into the registry so multi-key is now there and many of us are planning to use this for DID methods if you are going to use CBOR-LD you can use multi-base and mult-hash they are complementary ✪
Manu Sporny: IPFS and many people are using them - uptick in interest. I think they are still relevant and the key stuff is being addressed. People are not spending a lot of time. ✪
Joni: Digital identity authentication and council of Canada - 75-80 members (They fund us) members from public and private sector - federal government, treasury board secretariet ect. ✪
Joni: many technology organizations providing solutions and services. We were created out of a mandate out of the minister of finance of government of canada ✪
Joni: we have taken a economic focus - what can digital identity do to move GDP ✪
Heather Vescent: +1 Pan Canadian Trust Framework! ✪
Joni: work publishing papers, inform decision makers - principles - open standards being one of them. Pan Canadian Trust Framework focus on guidance and timelines for people. Broad surface ✪
Joni: the scope of what we are looking at with Pan Canadian trust framework - legal, policy - technical and LOA - private and public sector interoperating together. Distributed landscape. Technology model agnostic. Componentized used in different ways. should be able to be used for (old-school) federation and new emerging identity ecosystems. Networks for identity. range of different flavors and kinds of networks. ✪
Joni: SSI - to trusted operator type networks. Pan Canadian is reaching 1.0 - we are alpha testing the framework with public and private sector networks - starting to circle around verify a digital wallet. ✪
Joni: what does it mean to verify a network. Not there yet on verification of network or wallet. ✪
Joni: public sector profile is more focused on public sector issuance of credentials for public sector uses ✪
Joni: would love to hear from folks who would like to collaborate or engage. Get involved on twitter or via linkedIn - we do many public consultations everyone is welcome. ✪
Wayne Chang: Decentralized Identity Foundation - Dan Buchner ✪
Daniel Buchner: DIF organization leans on the engineering side - some other efforts too glossary. Tend to be on engineering things people need for implementation. ✪
Drummond Reed: Launched the first week of may 27 member companies - now at under 120 ✪
Drummond Reed: Hosted by the Linux Foundation it is a JDF project - it can produce pre-standards specification. WE have an open participation policy. Takes a few min to join. ✪
Drummond Reed: Paid small company and big company options. ✪
Drummond Reed: Goal of TIOP interoperable stack - decentralized ID and decentralized ✪
Karyn Bright: Thanks for the opportunity - northwest of England ✪
Karyn Bright: In existence informal pull it together in a more formal way - clear vision and mission. ✪
Karyn Bright: Identity solutions that are intended for everyone be built by everyone. ✪
Karyn Bright: Starting out with a clear vision and purpose - grow membership groups around this. ✪
Karyn Bright: Started out as a formal networking support network to meet others at conferences. ✪
Karyn Bright: Became apparent wanted to see wider representation in identity - racial diversity and disability and identity making sure everyone is represented. 1100 members around 60 countries ✪
Karyn Bright: Supporting via communications now moved to webinars and virtual meetups. ✪
Karyn Bright: Now thinking about our vision 2021 what people want is support with career development. ✪
Karyn Bright: Mentoring programs and interested in that - what resources do we need - we thought people wanted technical help. what our mission now is helping women and underrepresented groups in the industry. ✪
Karyn Bright: Ultimately not going into competition with the industry - we are working with them to get more underrepresented folks on panels. ✪
Sam Curren: More then just an idea working cross credential exchange multiple for interoperable. originally Hyperledger Indy but now broadening to others. ✪
Heather Vescent: One of the reasons I wanted to hear about all these groups. I would like to see the groups work together. I was just curious to hear from some of the groups and your actions for working WITH other groups. ✪
Sam Curren: Areas that mentioned - there is enough work to do - more people working on it wanted to do it moved over to DIF. ✪
Sam Curren: Similar thing happening with presentation exchange with DIF - personally I think that is nice when stuff happens that solves our problems so nice when we solve it from the ground up. ✪
Drummond Reed: With trust over IP we are explicitly helping assemble and integraete components. DIF, W3C, etc we are all about how do we bring this together into interoperable stack. With our program manager we are going to be trying to set up liason relationships to respond ✪
Adrian Hope-Bailie: So I hear the word interoperable - repeated all the time in this and other contexts and my perspective I don't hear anything that looks like interoperability bluetooth logo etc. ✪
Adrian Hope-Bailie: Is this my problem - how are we going to translate interoperability into a finite series of badges that people will undersatnd. ✪
Daniel Buchner: I think to some extent we are ab it early. - we are seeing the components becuase it is something being heavily worked on - presentation exchange stuff ✪
Daniel Buchner: So the exchange credential work is using same logic ✪
Daniel Buchner: More success in the next 18 months then we have in the last 3 years ✪
Wayne Chang: W3C credentials community gruop - cultiveate new work - community reports, registries of things, figure out where things can graduate to become standards. ✪
Wayne Chang: A lot of our prerogative to support new proto-standards to graduate to standards bodies ✪
Juan Caballero: Interoperability the DIF interop working group has been re-chaired (Juan, Kaliya, Pam) ✪
Juan Caballero: Overview of existing prior art is where we are starting. SVIP, DIACC, TOIP, we have a good place to start ✪
Drummond Reed: As co-editor of DID spec - lean towards that ✪
Drummond Reed: Agents that speak DIDComm that speak SIOP ✪
Sam Curren: Personal favorite that is starting a long time Indy was the only ecosystem with a variety of credentials that we did - we are seeing broader adoption of these - heading towards more interop with ZKP - future of that. We have collectively figured out ways to get benifit in new ways ✪
Juan Caballero: Universal Wallet CCG work item when? ✪
Orie Steele: Because the question was asked universal wallet was proposed - spec, interop, still waiting for another company to endorse it to become an official work item. ✪