Verifiable Credentials HTTP API Telecon
Minutes for 2021-08-10
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2021Aug/0127.html Topics Intros VC HTTP API Renaming Poll Feature Scoping Organizer Manu Sporny
Scribe Juan Caballero
Mike Prorock, Manu Sporny, Bob Wyman, Markus Sabadello, Mike Varley, Andrew Hughes, David Chadwick, Mahmoud Alkhraishi, Brian Richter, Ted Thibodeau, Charles E. Lehner, Dmitri Zagidulin, Kaliya Young, Eric Schuh, Juan Caballero, Aaron Coburn, Joe Andrieu, Adrian Gropper, Brent Zundel, Orie Steele, Marty Reed, Andrew Rosen Audio Log
Warning: Your browser does not support the HTML5 audio element, please upgrade.
Juan Caballero is scribing.
<orie> 1969? are you a cobalt developer unicorn?
<mprorock> *cobol i assume orie?
/Me cobalt lol
Topic: VC HTTP API Renaming Poll
<andrew_hughes> I think given Orie's text, we should call it the VC Cobalt Unicorn API now
<mprorock> second part of instructions note
(Scribe aside: +1 voting math is hard)
Topic: Feature Scoping
<manu> Email that went out to mailing list about this ^^^
<dmitriz> I assumed what was meant by Issuer is - if the issuer is hosting a revocation list / bitmap
(Manu duplicates some rows to create distinctions based on client and server)
<tallted> is that Issuance? (first item)
(Manu live-edits the notes column to be more explanatory about the link column as complementary to this being out of scope here)
Orie, q+ plz
<orie> Holder same trust domain vs Holder cross trust domain.
<mike_varley> "Presentation Service" - is this not a Verifer Service? Or is there no obligation to 'verify' ?
<orie> I called them "Holder" and "Exchange"
<orie> in the proposal above
Scribe aside: page 4 here is partial
<tallted> It seems to me that some of this might be made clearer by moving Action to come first. It would also help to item-number these -- not in priority or action order, per se -- just so we can say things like "API calls 1-7"
<orie> please read
Scribe aside: you are one of us use-case guys, Joe
<orie> its push because it starts with a network request from the prover.
<joe_andrieu> isn't the "prover" the "holder", Orie?
<orie> the word holder is less helpful
<orie> both sides are going to be holders.
<joe_andrieu> perhaps, but it is the term in the VC spec
<orie> the first guy is going to authenticate
<orie> as part of the VP.
<orie> hense push
Scribe aside: this spreadsheet helps a lot, we use case guys will look at this with or without Joe
<mprorock> this stuff is work in progress that will evolve over time, and this feels much more defined than we have had to date