Kaliya: Hi thanks for sharing about IW and people should also know that if. ✪
Kaliya: Accessibility is an issue over price you can come and talk to us about. ✪
Kaliya: That we're really committed to opening it up I have another event that people might be interested in called mitigating harms on 13 happening April 1 if I'm on my phone so it's hard to put it into chat if you search on Eventbrite for mitigating harms and web three it'll come up and it's yeah five hours on April 1 depending on what time zone you're on. ✪
Kaliya: And that's when I just have one more thing I I'm it's kind of an aside I'm working with a verifiable credentials policy committee on getting some legislation passed in California to create a trust framework and a pilot project within higher well within education so if there's anybody in this group based in California interested in helping say something to your legislators about this. ✪
Kaliya: I think email kaliya at identity woman dotnet. ✪
<deb_everhart> deadline for proposals is April 15 and the conference is Aug 1-2 f2f and Aug 9 virtual
<colin,_lef> Woot woot!
Topic: About CCG Email Thread: "Centralization dangers of applying OpenID Connect to wallets" (Dmitri Zagidulin)
<kerri_lemoie> (ignore topic having the floor - Dmitiri has the floor)
<kerri_lemoie> Feel free to queue up your questions about this.
<phil_l_(p1)> Isn't step 1 actually choose your identifier, and then choose your wallet?
<jim_goodell> Locking a wallet to an institution sounds problematic to me. Could it be select from market leader listed but also have an "other" option to enter the domain of another wallet provider?
<kayode_ezike> Maybe for a broader group, but any thoughts around specificying wallet selection via DID services?
<marty_reed> as an example, we allow the user to create their own e-mail VC to a SOVRIN based wallet, IDRamp, Trinsic, Evernym and then allow them to authenticate via OIDC in the Open Credential Publisher wallet and Teacher Wallet
Phil_L_(P1): Hi Dmitry couple of things first of all is it actually the case at the first problem is the wallet selection and not the identifier selection that is to say if we are encouraging dids and and of course one can have multiple bids is that is the first question that has to be dealt with what's the identify I'm going to match my University ID to. ✪
Phil_L_(P1): Is that actually in preceding the problem of the the NASCAR wallet selection that's my question. ✪
Phil_L_(P1): So that's a while its responsibility okay so in that in that the second question was related to that if I can continue that is I get the NASCAR problem and the sort of neat the pressure that that imposes to have as few stickers as possible but the question that emerges is if there were a central registry of wallets and you had just simply a drop-down what you start typing. ✪
Phil_L_(P1): your wallet and it finds you and that's that. ✪
<deb_everhart> like shibboleth
Phil_L_(P1): If the last question is the one of the things you didn't mention is isn't part of the concern about the centralization or at least the way in which ODI see connected is designed is at it it's certainly alerts to the to the authenticating provider a request that you've made. ✪
<phil_l_(p1)> Another concern is that the centralized registry of wallets must require demonstrated interop among the wallets added into the list. Dmitri referred to the gatekeeping issue at the registry level, of which this is a part.
<kayode_ezike> In a native mobile setting, is there a design that resembles “share via”?
<marty_reed> great discussion Dmitri, well explained!
<kayode_ezike> Awesome, thanks Dmitri!
Phil_L_(P1): Yeah I remember the reading through that that thread and I thought there was a comment there that said that web share was not from a security perspective sufficiently robust because of the potential phishing that is available. ✪
Phil_L_(P1): So Webster has protections that are encrypted in the way in which it's shared okay. ✪