Nis Jespersen : This is another issue from Vladimir, with a discussion on address ✪
Ted Thibodeau: If it remember correctly this was that uncefact need to get their act together ✪
Nis Jespersen : I think this is worth looking at agin after Cfact(?) has matured, let me give myself a note on this ✪
Ted Thibodeau: It's probably worth opening an issue on their stuff to point out the problem, such as their line number things ✪
Nis Jespersen : This came up on a UN meeting yesterday, and someone was positive about this change as street is more Western oriented. ✪
Ted Thibodeau: I think it's good way to do things, it's that if they are names as lined numeric versus lined number word, i think there will be issues ✪
Nis Jespersen : Putting on my UN hat i would be happy to address that, but let's not get into that now ✪
Nis Jespersen : I'll assign myself on this issue ✪
Nis Jespersen : This is done and it's great to finally be able to use npm run test to debug. ✪
Nis Jespersen : In this case we need an example, which I agree on Orie's last comment ✪
Nis Jespersen : Everytime I look at these measurements, I choke on lack of example. Any suggestions for how to push this forward? ✪
Mahmoud Alkhraishi: I don't think anyone here as worked with the Allotrope framework, so it's hard to allocate anyone to work on this ✪
Mahmoud Alkhraishi: I think we should ask Vladimir for examples on this, but the earliest we could take a look at it is by March if anyone else can look at it before then ✪
Mahmoudl there is a reference to W3C cube, which we can use as a reference ✪
Mahmoud Alkhraishi: Who ever volunteers would volunteer for both, we have two separate proposals for the same problem, so we can track this on a single issue ✪
Nis Jespersen : I'm not sure which one we want to close, I'd prefer to keep them both open ✪
Nis Jespersen : Next one is visualization guide, we have some more visualizations we could introduce ✪
Orie Steele: I'm doing something related to this right now as a we speak ✪
Orie Steele: It's like saying okay you have a Mill Test Report, but what are all of the terms in that credential ✪
Orie Steele: There are two ways to approach this, one is to process the schema, and the other is to process the final example credential, it seems like using the schema is a more direct approach than the JSON-LD ✪
Orie Steele: For each of the credential types, how do we show it meets the customer requirements. And for each credential it's what are the required fields? ✪
Orie Steele: If anyone has opinions about what they want to see, it would be nice to get more requests in this issue ✪
Nis Jespersen : I was thinking something different, I was thinking that we were doing the same thing for all schemas, and not have different visualizations per schema. ✪
Nis Jespersen : One thing that comes into this is that we're trying not to define new terms, so having something to prove that we're using existing terms. ✪
Nis Jespersen : Orie, can I assign you to the issue? ✪
Mahmoud Alkhraishi: One of the things that we figured out when adding country code definitions, we wanted to not overload text. The goal of this was to update schema.org to allow for three character country codes ✪
Nis Jespersen : Would it make any sense to switch away from schema.org's definition? ✪
Mahmoud Alkhraishi: I don't know, I haven't given it any throught ✪
Nis Jespersen : This is really a weakness of schema dot org. Not sure if what I'm suggesting makes sense. The link I included is not really a term definition. ✪
Nis Jespersen : The suggestion here is to change traceable presentation to workflow presentation. ✪
Nis Jespersen : To Ted's first point in the issue, it is a presentation carrying a workflow, so this is a more descriptive name. ✪
Ted Thibodeau: It seems like it flows naturally, if this change is being made, then the other changes in the issue make sense. ✪
Ted Thibodeau: I'm in my same position as I was on September 9th, that I don't have enough context from the snippet in the start of the issue to have a strong opinion. ✪
Nis Jespersen : I can add a link to the traceable presentation definition. To quickly describe it, it's a workflow definition ✪
Orie Steele: For everything we have, we should have a link back to the definition. If we click that link, does it resolve to an explanation, or is that text the problem? ✪
Nis Jespersen : So all it does right now is to make a connection to workflow. Originally I made the name traceable-presentations, since it came from the traceability repositories, it made sense to name it after ourselves. ✪
Ted Thibodeau: It makes more sense to say you minted this term, and after consideration you have a better phrase for the term. So i have no argument. ✪
Nis Jespersen : Can we label this as "Ready for PR"? ✪
Nis Jespersen : Let's try to do one more, next is 546 from Ben ✪
Nis Jespersen : The context around this was that we gathered a lot of requirements that could be added into traceability-vocab, but didn't have the bandwidth to address ✪
Ted Thibodeau: I would suggest updating the issue name since that wasn't clear from the title. I suggest we add the "Help Wanted" tag , as well as "Good First Issue" ✪
Nis Jespersen : This is an issue to track specifically how many schemas we had errors on when running npm run test. This has been addressed, and we can close this. ✪
Nis Jespersen : That concludes the meeting for this week, do we have someone to post the minutes? ✪