VC API Task Force
Transcript for 2023-01-24
Our Robot Overlords are scribing.
Topic: Introductions and Relevant Community Updates
Patrick_(IDLab): That's just a heads up so we'll know in two weeks where I can have a full-time test developer ideal and so we are looking at probably making some contributions to various this sweet like the VC API this with is probably going to be one we're going to look at so. ✪
Patrick_(IDLab): Hello invites him probably not next week but the week after and production. ✪
Patrick_(IDLab): Oh yeah sure to YouTube video so it was just a presentation to trust over IP from here. ✪
Topic: Pull Requests
Patrick_(IDLab): Yeah just I told you forgot to leave a comment I was wondering so on the end points where you apply them you don't include the did odd was that voluntary or involuntary. ✪
Patrick_(IDLab): Sorry the first step being what. ✪
Patrick_(IDLab): Okay it's more of like a placeholder type of field. ✪
Topic: Do the /exchanges/* endpoints need authz?
Patrick_(IDLab): Just want to make sure I understand when you say no a lot that's literally mean the authorization is optional or that endpoint. ✪
Patrick_(IDLab): Right if it's strictly internal component component okay. ✪
<nate_otto> Yeah, there may be a bug in the intent of "noAuth" here, don't know what "bearer": "emptystring" will do but that can be fixed to properly mean "auth header(s) are optional".
<dave_longley> we might want to define "noAuth" as "firewall" or something instead
Topic: Verifier API should return verified VCs
Patrick_(IDLab): When we send a ray of credential we mean the whole credential or just the credentials subject. ✪
Patrick_(IDLab): Yeah just about this section you mentioned the JWT input outputs and the final thing that goes along with multi credential support because is it Julia T DW T consider the w3c verifiable credential or it's considered as as its own sort of credential format. ✪
Patrick_(IDLab): Cuz I coding is if you look at the page for the data model 1.1 there's clearly a section about JWT but there's also like it's on spec yeah. ✪
Patrick_(IDLab): Smite my gut feeling would be that I don't really see the point of returning the actual VC if I mean you clearly sent it as an input it returns you if it's verified or not if it returns you the VC is just returning you what you and put in so I don't know how I maybe there's use case I don't see but just at first I thought I don't really see the point. ✪
Patrick_(IDLab): I just put myself that quickly regarding the data model 2.0 that's being drafted when when and if it gets to a point that it's published is it going to supersede that that our model 1.0 or they're both going to sort of Live And. ✪
Patrick_(IDLab): Yeah for whichever reason. ✪
<nate_otto> (so that's a "a response body of the VC is useful sometimes" +1 to @dlongley)