Nis Jespersen : Ben and I discussion today. nudging self, will look into this soon ✪
Orie Steele: If it's ready for pr sure, but I didn't see poke comment. ✪
Nis Jespersen : Reason it hasn't progressed is because I hadn't looked at it. But yes let's talk ✪
Orie Steele: What's it need. commentary on directionality? ✪
Nis Jespersen : Christina pointing at sentence that's DID Auth ✪
Orie Steele: Should be adding section on [?]. Any comment other than poking yourself. If others have thoughts, briefly discussion here could prompt others to say "oh I have a comment", take swing at ✪
<arun> Hello everyone, I would like to bring up a few questions. Please let me know when it is time for open discussions.
Orie Steele: To be efficient, we can do 1 jump here. There's open issues under discussion for VC 2, to restrict requested registered media types. Let's not make any changes until we know what work we need. Go to working group, "we only need to implement SE[?] JWT". ✪
Nis Jespersen : Agreed. Seems like chris is assigned. Marked ready for pr, seems in line with what you said ✪
Nis Jespersen : Next 405, very related, Support for SD-JWT. Orie? ✪
Orie Steele: There's update. We updated example plugin to use SD-JWT by default. As mentioned proposal to withdrow non SD-JWT use cases. We have this new example of SD-JWT in jose-cose test suite. There's been progress in upstream suite, but we should drive concensus in working group for just SD-JWT. Regular JWT just doesn't have the features. Will leave link to that issue, as did previously. ✪
Nis Jespersen : Probably not. ready for pr, mahmoud appropriate owner, moving on ✪
Nis Jespersen : 588, Review the CHAPI Playground and Newly Added Protocols ✪
Orie Steele: There's been updates to chapi, openid connect for vc-api support ✪
Nis Jespersen : Comments? thoughts on direction? ✪
<arun> Coran and I were trying to unmute and speak. We were not able to. I’ll go ahead and ask those questions here.
Benjamin Collins: Sentence, trace api focused on non-interaction? kind of worried abt intermingling standards, adding dependencies in other places ✪
<nis> Yes, please Arun...
Orie Steele: Problem is chapi experience is better than it is now. feels wrong to say "we don't like it but don't have better" fine to say "this is best but we don't like it". Have watched chapi, openid has not created better experience. ✪
<arun> Are there reference implementations of the spec or is it expected that each organisation implement their own following the spec? I’ll have more questions based on this answer. My apologies in advance of this is not the right forum for my questions. I see that the chat here is focused on the standards than implementation itself.
Orie Steele: Try on chrome? or firefox, in case using safari ✪
Nis Jespersen : Yes right place for this. no ref implementation, but are you aware of our test suite? there are postman collections you can download run against your implementation, should make it clear ✪
Orie Steele: Looking for ref implementations for spec. at least open source api.did.actor project used in beginning, but drifted far out of date at this pt. ✪