Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-interop/pulls ✪

Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-interop/pull/595 ✪

Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-interop/pull/605 ✪

Nis Jespersen : Interop week, 595, good to go? yes ✪

Nis Jespersen : Ready to merge ✪

Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/pulls ✪

Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/pull/913 ✪

Nis Jespersen : Any objections to merging 605? ✪

Mahmoud Alkhraishi: This is supposed to be generic commercial invoice ✪

Nis Jespersen : Only changing title, not json key ✪

Nis Jespersen : Approvals on 913? objections? ✪

Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/pull/915 ✪

Nis Jespersen : Objections? merging ✪

Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-interop/issues/589 ✪

Patrick St-Louis: On aligning workflows, 589? ✪

Nis Jespersen : From august... for some reason ben asked mahmoud to comment ✪

Mahmoud Alkhraishi: Manu's point is that this is already really close, from what I'm reading of workflows as a concept, same across both apis. So not sure what's an actionable item. ✪

Patrick St-Louis: So very similar but there will be differences in the short term? ✪

Nis Jespersen : Still did auth based? we're large moving away from that, to oauth. is that what we'd be aligning to here? ✪

Patrick St-Louis: As I understand workflows, whenever external party wants to engage, workflow based on applications, this is how exchange starts ✪

Nis Jespersen : Can read the def of how we use workflows. can think of as way to combine diff presentations,m diff parties, into same workflow ✪

Patrick St-Louis: I'll leave a comment here to discuss, if still open in a few weeks close it ✪

Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-interop/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-asc ✪

Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-interop/issues/531 ✪

Nis Jespersen : Appreciate that you raised and that you volunteered ✪

Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-interop/issues/482 ✪

Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-interop/issues/543 ✪

Manu Sporny: Saw you were talking abt issue 539, thought I'd provide some background ✪

Nis Jespersen : Volunteer to connect the two, patrick already did. I think we could spend next 5mins trying to do that verbally ✪

Manu Sporny: Yes, highly aligned with vc-api. ✪

Mahmoud Alkhraishi: Makes sense, but where's workflow instance or def sent? equivalent to traceable presentation? ✪

Manu Sporny: Out of scope, undefined, implementations can define ✪

Nis Jespersen : Might want to look at how post them on trace vocab ✪

Patrick St-Louis: Writing comment on issue; propose we leave it open til end of year ✪

Nis Jespersen : Great thanks ✪