Phillip_Long_(T3): Okay I just a plus one on that last comment from John and I know you mentioned it is one of the dimensions of accessibility but from Sharon's list of wallet providers conversations with the DiWalla who have primarily focused on the African Community in Nigeria Uganda in that area. ✪
Phillip_Long_(T3): Suggest we invite their cto to participate because they're addressing this at the back end in ways that would be worthwhile for us to hear about. John just alluded to the fact they're trying to do that at the back end of a tln and pocket as well so just a suggestion. ✪
<sharon_leu> We also thought the Tykn wallet gives an interesting approach.
Phillip_Long_(T3): Yeah just want to point out this sounds very similar to endorsements and perhaps Marty might be interested in commenting on this but it sounds very much like endorsements in the teacher certification round. ✪
Phillip_Long_(T3): Institution to another institutions. ✪
Phillip_Long_(T3): Potential and I just want to highlight that overlap because it's a different use case but it sounds like it is in terms of an implementation strategy comparable. ✪
<deb_everhart> comment on this interface-- it sometimes makes my laptop overheat, and today seems to be worse-- I don't know if that could be related to the updates
<kayode_ezike> Along the lines of display logic is error logging
<phillip_long_(t3)> That encompasses university integration but also HR system implementation for businesses
<phillip_long_(t3)> It's both an integration issue and a training issue on the part of these regulators.
<phillip_long_(t3)> Transcriber is having trouble LOL
<phillip_long_(t3)> Data ownership is probably a separate issue
<phillip_long_(t3)> Credential status is emerging as a big topic for the VC CCG, provoked recently by Anil.
Phillip_Long_(T3): Simply an attempt to try to pull together the different conversations in one place so that we're not having three different sets of them and respective silos. I know it's been a conversation at the HR open Community. I know it's been a conversation here, a conversation at T3 and for all I know maybe in many others. so I think it would be wise to try to pull these things together and save ourselves some calendar time but also to bring together the different perspectives that these different organizations have as priorities and see if we can't work out a way to make endorsement work for everybody. ✪
Phillip_Long_(T3): You're right that this does relate to the previous conversations in a couple of different ways. ✪
Phillip_Long_(T3): Both in terms of complex issuance and things like that but the standard thing we're thinking about here is really in the context of an individual making an endorsement to another individual's credential to give credibility to or third-party verification for the assertion both corroborating what might be in the institutional issue credential for subject but also corroborating what might be in a self-sorted credential by an individual about something they've learned and and wanting to take advantage of external knowledgeable people for whom their attestation to that ended the subjects ability to do whatever it is, is reinforced. ✪
<phillip_long_(t3)> What I don't see on the list is conformance testing - or guidance about test suites.