CCG Verifiable Credentials for Education Task Force Telecon
Minutes for 2021-08-16
- 0. Moderator: Start Recording
- 1. Agenda Review
- 2. IP Note
- 3. Call Notes
- 4. Scribe Selection
- 5. Introductions & Reintroductions
- 6 Update on Open Badges Alignment with VCs
- Kerri Lemoie
- Marty Reed
- Balazs, Kerri Lemoie, Tzviya Siegman, Marty Reed, Stuart Freeman, Nate Otto, Steve Gance, Taylor Kendall, Keith Kowal, Dmitri Zagidulin, Sheryl, Kayode Ezike, David Ward, Bob Wyman, Colin Reynolds, Learning Economy
- Audio Log
Topic: 0. Moderator: Start Recording
Topic: 1. Agenda Review
Topic: 2. IP Note
Topic: 3. Call Notes
Topic: 4. Scribe Selection
Marty Reed is scribing.
Topic: 5. Introductions & Reintroductions
KL: anyone new to the call or want to re-intro?
Topic: 6 Update on Open Badges Alignment with VCs
KL: update on VCs and 2 IMS specs, OB and CLR
KL: proposal has been made to OB workgroup for OB 3.0 alignment to VC
KL: updates made to proposal based on feedback from workgroup
KL: pushback from CLR to align both specs with VC
KL: 2 charters to align achievements and assertions with VC.
KL: 2 new project groups will be formed there
MR: CLR will be on similar timeframe.
KL: Chairs for VC-EDU will reconvene in the coming week.
KL: updates to proposal for OB 3.0, add to Design Goals, Mapping skills and Additional Terms for achievement, assertion and result.
KL: update to proposal: hasCredential replaced with achievement and achievement properties
KL: github has all difs
KL: next steps for VC-EDU workgroup, Data Model recommendation, complex credentials, evidence, verifiable presentations
<dmitri_zagidulin> Kerri - I'd love to help, with that data model doc
KL: spreadsheet aligns OB CLR
NO: need to transition how we work next and where the discussion should go next, align use cases
NO: what partnerships are available, what DID methods, other layers of the text stack
KL: need to make sure this group is not just about OB
KL: particularly exchanges
KL: need to do more research on types
KL: OB types discussion difficult a few years ago
NO: this group is open where we can submit these ideas and other properties and use cases outside OB and CLR
NO: history over time around types and did not get agreement
NO: currently OB has good coverage in North American centric approach
NO: credential engine has good accomodations for types
KL: agenda for next Monday is open
MR: good time, but second NO on sending out a doodle
KL: close meeting