The W3C Credentials Community Group

Meeting Transcriptions and Audio Recordings (2014-today)

Go Back


Credentials CG Telecon

Minutes for 2021-09-21

<geun-hyung_> =
<cel> /me 2021
<tallted> 2021! :-)
<heather_vescent> Join the CCG: https://www.w3.org/community/credentials/join
<heather_vescent> Minutes archive: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/meetings/
<kim> I am here but I've paid my dues maintaining the scribing infrastructure for years
steve_gance is scribing.
steve_gance is scribing.

Topic: Introductions & Reintroductions?

Topic: Announcements & Reminders

Mike Prorock: Comment period for min standards for driver licenses for federal agencies (DHS) extended to Oct. 18, relevant to DIDS, etc. getting VCs out in broader usage.
Oct. 12-14 is IIW, pay attention, anyone plan to speak?
<heather_vescent> TPAC Breakouts: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues/210
<heather_vescent> Details a TPAC breakout session: https://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC/2021/SessionIdeas
Announcement: tpac is coming up, Oct. 26 presentation, tpac put an announcement for breakouts, details at link, Oct. 18-22 is breakout week
<markus_sabadello> Explain abbreviations for non-regular participants? E.g. DHS = Department of Homeland Security, IIW = Internet Identity Workshop, TPAC = Technical Plenary Advisory Committee.
CCG chairs have discussed one-on-one Q&A sessions. Others interested in developing breakouts? comment on CG thread
Mike Prorock: +1 Markus, thanks
CCG have added item for consensus process....
<heather_vescent> Consensus in community reports: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues/212
In community reports (see link)
Once deliverable report is in final stage, want people to review and have community response, both objections and support.
Chairs believe this will help reports follow consensus process, but also allow more diverse viewpoints.
Also allows more transparency and broader participation
Mike Prorock: Nb: good final point to add sections that state "some members of the community...."

Topic: VC JWT Interop Test Artifact Repo

Six work items
Discussion about VC data model, its compatibility with other data models. Talk of setting up repo but that's on hold for now as we discuss related aspects.
Heather Vescent: Should we note this as a proposed work item?
Orio: Recommend leaving as proposed work item. Don't create a repo now if it will be empty, do it latter.
Diff item is like a sprint, needs to be done in 3 months. New items will probably arise. Not on hold indefinitely, but 3 months max.
Do we need to check in December or Jan? Yes

Topic: Drawing the line on DID Methods in/out of CCG Scope

Chairs have had discussion on in/out of scope: don't include every DID method in scope. What is criteria to include a DID method?
A DID method that supports community goals, across community, or multiple people within community working on them, then these would be included in scope. But we still need more guidance on what is or is not in scope.
Last time primary objection was whether it relied on blockchain. Two methods do not rely on blockchain. Suggest focusing attention on this aspect. These criteria should be applied equally: regardless of whether these rely on blockchain, these should be accepted.
There is at least one method, maybe more, that rely on a particular blockchain, versus something that is agnostic to particular blockchains. For consistency sake, might want to clarify this.
Markus Sabadello: Agree with orie
Orie Steele: +1 Ryan :)
Ryan Grant: Picking what is in the community or out for the technology is not the right approach. It should be out of the community to say why something should or should not be included.
Orie Steele: +1 Blockchain / KERI / IPFS / etc... we should not discriminate against technologies in this community :)
<markus_sabadello> +1, excluding specific technologies makes no sense
<orie> ^ especially if such discrimination is part of blocking "standards track".... DIDs and VCs started as community work items...
<mprorock> @markus exactly - we absolutely do NOT want to exclude ANY specific technologies
Charles E. Lehner: Heather_Vescent: for DID methods to be developed in the CCG, they need to support community goals, and have multiple people who want to work on it
Mike Prorock: +1 Orie - that is the key thing, we want to make sure that we are promoting items that can become standards track if possible
<cel> ... If multiple people want to work in the community on a DID method that supports community goals but does use a work item, ... if approved it would be a legit work item.
<cel> ... It is a scope question.
Ted Thibodeau is scribing.
Charles E. Lehner: Heather_Vescent: should have a separate conversation, or in a GitHub thread...
<kim> I don't see any reason to modify the usual criteria -- if at least 2 people from different orgs offer to lead it, then it's good
Mike Prorock: To clarify, for potential clarification... How should we be thinking of work items as a community... We do not want to block specific techs... [scribe assist by Charles E. Lehner]
<cel> ... If leveraging bitcoin, cool, seeing approaches apply to multiple things... that should be clear.
<cel> ... Other thing to be careful about... when we are looking at specific work items... is it working on something that can ultimately become a standards item?
<rgrant> I don't think that we want to "be careful" but that we want to foster innovation.
<cel> ... Doesn't have to necessarily, but let's get the conversation going around the criteria, as a community.
<cel> ... CCG is getting more active - more work item proposals - need to evaluate.

Topic: did.pkh

<orie> I think we want more did methods in the ccg, not less, especially if doing so, raises the bar for the method... https://w3c-ccg.github.io/didm-btcr/

Topic: did.tz

Charles E. Lehner: Heather_Vescent: Let's talk about these two DID methods, did:pkh and did:tz
<heather_vescent> ttps://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues/202
<cel> ... I think I am kind of reiterating the obvious, based on the criteria stated, based on the criteria (we, chairs) agreed on as a guideline, these would be approved... and we would request did:tz to be withdrawn.
<rgrant> Ahh, there it is, "rehome" my DID Method.
Charles E. Lehner: Heather_Vescent: Need to know if we can re-home some items...
Wayne Chang: I would request that whatever is agreed upon is applied consistently upon work items, even if approved before. [scribe assist by Charles E. Lehner]
Mike Prorock: +1
<orie> moving community work out of the community seems pretty bad form....
<cel> ... If accepted I would like to see the same kind of designation applied to previous ones... did:v1, did:btcr, maybe others.
Charles E. Lehner: Heather_Vescent: Good points... we could take a "grandfathering" state, those are there and have been in the community for a long time, and not accepting the other ones...
<orie> why are we considering "not accepting work items the community wants to work on" ?
<cel> ... Wayne, did you have comments on the proposal to accept pkh as a work item and withdraw did:tz?
<dmitriz> (incidentally, we should probably not use 'grandfather clause' terminology, and substitute with 'legacy')
Charles E. Lehner: Heather_Vescent: To answer that... it has to do with scope.
Juan Caballero: How does one withdraw a work item? Just close the issue? [scribe assist by Charles E. Lehner]
Heather Vescent: You can make a comment, ask for withdrawal; it can be acknowledged by chairs and then closed. [scribe assist by Charles E. Lehner]

Topic: BBS+ signature scheme for LDP using JSON pointer normalization

Charles E. Lehner: Heather_Vescent: Moving forward. Next work item: BBS Signature Scheme
Charles E. Lehner: Tomislav_Markovski: This proposal deals with extending the BBS signature scheme with an additional normalization algorithm, JSON pointer normalization.
<cel> ... This is interesting because BBS uses a multi-message payload to sign documents, currently it is obtained using JSON-LD processing (URDNA2015). This proposal is to use JSON Pointer Normalization instead, to merge the document into a form usable in a multi-message format.
<cel> ... JSON Pointer is on IETF standards track... looks similar to JSON Path... A complex JSON document can be flattened into a single JSON document.
<cel> ... The POC document shows how a document can be converted... Whether it is JSON-LD compliant or not.
<cel> ... The linked data proof specs specifies some terms around canonicalization algorithm, which can be used to specify how the document was canonicalized before signing, in addition to signature algorithm and other items.
<cel> ... Thus far this has been the RDF canonicalization, with the exception of JCS...
<cel> ... Using this, the signature suite could be extended...
<cel> ... Because JSON Pointer operates on JSON documents, it works on both embedded and wrapped signatures.
<cel> ... So it can be used with different signature suites.
Charles E. Lehner: Heather_Vescent: Question: is this work in conjunction with DIF activities? How do you plan to coordinate?
<cel> ... There are no work items in DIF right now that are relevant to this specific work item - the linked data proofs.
<cel> ... However, there efforts to bring this... to JOSE. No dependency in required work.
Charles E. Lehner: Heather_Vescent: Great. It looks like you have hit all of the requirements.
<cel> ... Any other questions from the community?
<cel> ... I think we'll give this the 7-day review and then can open it as a work item.
<cel> ... Thanks for coming today, and for being brief and on-point.

Topic: VC Guide

<cel> ... Next: VC Guide. Are Michael Herman or David Chadwick on the call?
<cel> ... Not seeing either; we'll skip this.

Topic: Breakout use cases for VC HTTP API

<cel> ... Juan, Eric?
Juan Caballero: I am here, and involved with those use cases. Eric couldn't make it. [scribe assist by Charles E. Lehner]
<cel> ... Need a new repo. Trying to migrate to ReSpec.
<cel> ... It's just to have a separate repo that can be linked from the VC HTTP API.
<cel> ... It would still be discussed on those calls by that group, just need a separate repo.
Heather Vescent: Can you tell us what is the work item? [scribe assist by Charles E. Lehner]
Juan Caballero: The VC HTTP API Working Group started publishing more non-normative stuff. It was previously just a Swagger Doc that had been designed by some CCG companies and participants. [scribe assist by Charles E. Lehner]
<cel> ... As part of trying to make it more intelligible... business partners needed more context...
<cel> ... That weekly meeting is largely about technical stuff. There is a parallel work track, people working to make use cases supported by that API be explicit so you can point to use cases from the main meetings.
<steve_gance> (scribe lost internet for 10 minutes)
Heather Vescent: What is deliverable going to be, Word, respec?
<heather_vescent> Steve, Cel took over scribe for you.
<steve_gance> Google doc now, will be moved to respec.
Charles E. Lehner: +1
<steve_gance> (thanks cel)
<mprorock> Off Topic: added an issue to track and have discussion around scope for CCG work items, etc - e.g. anything related to credentials, etc - https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues/214
Heather Vescent: Do you have a repo, or chairs need to create it? [scribe assist by Charles E. Lehner]
Juan Caballero: I think Eric had one... [scribe assist by Charles E. Lehner]
<steve_gance> Is there a repo to transfer over, or do chairs need to create a new one?
<juan_caballero_(spruce)> will do in 3 hours, thanks!
<steve_gance> Not sure, will check whether a new repo is needed.

Topic: Merkle Disclosure Proof 2021

Orie Steele: BBS+ JsonLD+ suite is the first, but concern was it was too much of a snowflake. This work item proposes another method based on Merkle proof, as well as JWS. Work item is there to help us clarify selective disclosure interfaces.
Mike Prorock: Part of motivation: we always want an alternative to being tied to one crytographic methods. Select disclosure is a big issue.
Markus Sabadello: How does this relate to previous work item?
Mike Prorock: +1 Layer / interface compat with other selective disclosure methods
<steve_gance> Its related because it allows swapping the cryptographic layer, while still doing the selective disclosure.
<steve_gance> It is not related in the sense that this relies on boring Merkle or JWS
Heather Vescent: Looks like you have the requirements for a work item. Wait the 7 days and we can open a work item.

Topic: Revisit scope for DID methods & did.pkh & did.tz

Heather Vescent: Let's pick up discussion of DID methods.
Mike Prorock: Let's make sure we are properly capturing the will of the community.
<orie> probably not...
Heather Vescent: Can we decouple the score discussion from the discussion of the two DID methods?
Mike Prorock: +1 Orie - tightly coupled
<steve_gance> Scope question is being used to answer the DID question, so the scope question is critical to be addressed before we accept any more work items.
<orie> Please leave your comments here: https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues/214
Heather Vescent: I see it as being more flexible. I don't see the scope question being resolved easily. At a gut level it often seems what should be in scope and what shouldn't. Criteria for developing DID methods are generally what is supported by the community...
<kim> who had the concern?
<juan_caballero_(spruce)> ^
<wayne_chang> manu, i think
Heather Vescent: The concerns usually have been raised in a previous calls. A concern that if we accept every DID method we would be overwhelmed.
<kim> I think we should have that person write up their concern. this is a huge deviation from how we've accepted work items in the past
Heather Vescent: To me, the community goals can be addressed, maybe scope is irrelevant. Participation from multiple companies, is that a sufficient requirement for scope?
<steve_gance> Jaun: Part of the problem is that businesses don't address the concern, e.g., goggle cloud wants to make something that doesn't work for anyone else. Concern that multiple companies can also do things that are too narrowly scoped to benefit the larger community...
<heather_vescent> OK, so it's clear we need to decide on scope first, then review these work items.
<mprorock> would like to yield time to wayne
Juan Caballero: The intention is to have something that would be generally useful. Proposers of (multiple technologies) have usually been trying to benefit entire community.
<heather_vescent> I was wrong in thinking we could decide on these work items with the non-specific guidance at this time.
<orie> playing games with "rehoming work" is a slippery slope that will fracture the community and cause needless pain... the scope of ccg work should be limited only by the tools we have at our disposal... not political or economic interests of companies or non profits or governments.
<heather_vescent> it wasn't a concern about accepting work items.
Mike Prorock: +1 Issue opened to track any concerns
Kim Hamilton Duffy: BTCR (?) should be retired, it was important, but there is a bigger concern: we should have the person who has a concern about how we accept work items should write a concrete proposal. Otherwise, this discussion tends to block the community work. I don't think it's clear that a substantial concern has been raised.
<heather_vescent> Juan + Wayne, can you add your intent to the github thread?
Mike Prorock: DIDTC's implementation is formally verified, we wanted to bring that work to the group.
<kim> Just to be clear, not saying btcr should be retired, just saying that if anything, it should be retired due to inactivity, NOT because it uses the bitcoin blockchain
<kim> And Ryan's comment is addressing the inactivity concerns
<steve_gance> BTCR has a 2.0 that we are working on. We are in the middle of scheduling additional work. Some of the people on this call are active on this DID method...
<steve_gance> I don't think BTCR being here is a burden.
<juan_caballero_(spruce)> i think that BTC might be quite different from ETH and TZ in that it doesn't have development funds, which make feel even further from the allegation of being specific to a bundle of shared economic interests
Mike Prorock: +1 Heather
Heather Vescent: Sorry, I don't think that BTCR is under attack...
Orie Steele: +1 To not doing anything that fractures the community.
<juan_caballero_(spruce)> did:collusion
Heather Vescent: Maybe we don't need to do anything, just do the 7-day on these two DID processes and let the process play out...
Heather Vescent: Then we can deal with any collusion of DID methods as they arise.
<rgrant> Not just across companies, but across DID Methods!
<orie> sorry gonna need to drop, please don't decide to exclude folks who want to work together while i'm gone ; )
Mike Prorock: An important note: One of the benefits of the CCG has been to foster inoperability in a IP-protected space. Let's continue to make this a place to move this work forward, across DID methods...
<steve_gance> My inclination would be along an inclusivity path. There is a lot of discussion that could happen, let's move it to github and bring it up as needed.
Heather Vescent: I'll move these two issues to the 7-day process.
<juan_caballero_(spruce)> thx steve! and charles!

Meeting for 2019-12-17

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements and Reminders
  3. Action Items
  4. WebKMS

Meeting for 2019-12-10

Topics

  1. Agenda Review
  2. Introductions / Reintroductions
  3. Announcements and Reminders
  4. Progress & Action Items
  5. Verifiable Credentials for Education Task Force

Meeting for 2019-12-03

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements and Reminders
  3. Action Items
  4. did:key method

Meeting for 2019-11-12

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Announcements
  3. Action Items
  4. Personal Data Stores Comparison

Meeting for 2019-11-05

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements and Reminders
  3. Review action items and work items
  4. CCG 2020 Scope of work

Meeting for 2019-10-29

Topics

  1. Introductions / Re-Introductions
  2. Announcements
  3. Work Items and Action Items Review
  4. Year End Purge

Meeting for 2019-10-22

Topics

  1. Agenda review
  2. Announcements and Reminders
  3. Action Items
  4. Credential Schema Specification

Resolutions

  1. The W3C Credentials CG supports the rechartering of a Verifiable Credentials Maintenance Working Group.

Meeting for 2019-10-15

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements & Reminders
  3. Progress on Action Items
  4. DID handoff
  5. VC WG Maintenance Charter
  6. Contributing to JSON-LD Contexts

Meeting for 2019-10-08

Topics

  1. Introductions / Reintroductions
  2. Announcements & Reminders
  3. DIDs from a non-technical perspective
  4. IIW Report out

Meeting for 2019-09-10

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroduction
  2. Announcements & Reminders
  3. Action Items
  4. Verifiable Credentials next steps
  5. Decentralized Identity Working Group

Meeting for 2019-08-27

Topics

  1. Introductions and re-introductions
  2. DID working group charter / outreach
  3. Datashards
  4. Solid

Meeting for 2019-08-20

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements and Reminders
  3. Decentralized Topics at #RWOT9
  4. BTCR hackathon

Meeting for 2019-08-13

Topics

  1. Announcements and Reminders
  2. DID WG Charter and outreach
  3. Agents, Hubs, and More

Meeting for 2019-07-30

Topics

  1. intros and reintros
  2. announcements and reminders
  3. Progresson action items
  4. Standards setting process

Meeting for 2019-07-23

Meeting for 2019-07-09

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements and Reminders
  3. DID WG Charter Proposal
  4. Non-Violent Communication

Meeting for 2019-07-02

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements and Reminders
  3. Progress on Action Items
  4. Amira

Meeting for 2019-06-25

Topics

  1. Introductions and Re-introductions
  2. Accouncements
  3. Action Items
  4. Work Item Review, Fin

Meeting for 2019-06-18

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements and reminders
  3. Action Items
  4. Work item repair

Meeting for 2019-06-11

Topics

  1. Introductions and Re-introductions
  2. Announcements and Reminders
  3. Action Items
  4. Rubrics Task Force
  5. Credential CG Work Item Process Draft, simplified

Meeting for 2019-05-28

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements & Reminders
  3. Action Items
  4. Discuss New Work Item Process

Meeting for 2019-05-14

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements & Reminders
  3. Action Items
  4. Decentralized Identifier Rubrics

Meeting for 2019-05-07

Topics

  1. Introductions and Re-introductions
  2. Announcements
  3. Action Items
  4. Message from the chairs and ensuring a positive work environment
  5. IIW

Meeting for 2019-04-23

Topics

  1. Agenda review
  2. IP Note, call notes
  3. Introductions and re-introductions
  4. Announcements
  5. Open issues
  6. ABNF Task Force

Meeting for 2019-04-16

Topics

  1. Introductions / Reintroductions
  2. Annoucements and Reminders
  3. Action Items
  4. Survey Results

Meeting for 2019-04-02

Topics

  1. IP notes, call notes,
  2. Introductions & Reintroductions
  3. Announcements & Reminders
  4. Action Items
  5. DID Report out for AC Meeting
  6. Survey results

Meeting for 2019-03-26

Topics

  1. Introductions / Reintoroductions
  2. Announcements
  3. Progress on Action Items
  4. DIF Report Out

Meeting for 2019-03-19

Topics

  1. intros
  2. announcements and reminders
  3. Action items
  4. https DID method spec, and more

Meeting for 2019-03-12

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Annoucements and reminders
  3. Action Items
  4. RWOT8 Report Out

Meeting for 2019-02-19

Topics

  1. Introductions/Reintroductions
  2. Announcements
  3. Action Items
  4. Review ABNF PR

Meeting for 2019-02-12

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. announcements
  3. Action Items
  4. Use Cases

Meeting for 2019-02-05

Topics

  1. Introductions and Re-introductions
  2. Announcements and Reminders
  3. Work Item Review
  4. DID Issue Review

Meeting for 2019-01-29

Topics

  1. Introductions and Re-introductions
  2. Announcements and Reminders
  3. Action Items
  4. DID Pull Requests

Meeting for 2019-01-22

Topics

  1. Intros
  2. Announcements and reminders
  3. Progress on action items
  4. New work items
  5. Proposed work items
  6. DID Spec PR Triage

Meeting for 2019-01-15

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Announcements & Reminders
  3. Progress on Action Items
  4. Work Item Status Review
  5. New Work Items

Meeting for 2019-01-08

Topics

  1. Introductions and Re-introductions
  2. Announcements
  3. Action items
  4. Work items

Meeting for 2018-12-18

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Announcements and Reminders
  3. 2018 Year in Review

Meeting for 2018-12-04

Topics

  1. introductions
  2. reintroductions
  3. Announcements and Reminders
  4. DID resolver specification
  5. Work Items
  6. TAG charter review

Meeting for 2018-11-27

Topics

  1. Agenda Review
  2. Introductions / Reintroductions?
  3. Reminders and Events
  4. Progress on Current Action Items
  5. Work Items
  6. Review summary of previous DID stories, questions, painpoints meetings
  7. DID Summary High Points
  8. DID Explainer Template

Meeting for 2018-11-20

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements, reminders
  3. Action items
  4. Work Items
  5. Pain points

Meeting for 2018-11-13

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements
  3. Action Items
  4. Work Items
  5. DID Unique Selling Proposition

Meeting for 2018-11-06

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Update on Action Items
  3. Work Items
  4. W3C TPAC 2018
  5. IIW

Meeting for 2018-10-16

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements & Reminders
  3. Progress on Current Action Items
  4. Work Items
  5. TPAC Planning
  6. Feedback on charter

Meeting for 2018-10-09

Topics

  1. Agenda Review
  2. Introductions / Re-introductions
  3. Announcements / Reminders
  4. Progress on Action/Work Items
  5. W3C TPAC Planning.

Meeting for 2018-10-02

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements
  3. Review Action Items
  4. Work Items
  5. New Business
  6. RWoT7

Meeting for 2018-09-18

Topics

  1. Introductions & Reintroductions
  2. Announcements & Reminders
  3. Progress on Current Action Items
  4. Status of work items

Meeting for 2018-08-21

Meeting for 2018-08-14

Topics

  1. introductions and re-introductions
  2. announcements and reminders
  3. Progress on Current Action Items
  4. Progress on current action items
  5. Work items
  6. Jolocom

Meeting for 2018-08-07

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Review announcements
  3. Action items
  4. Work Items
  5. proof of personhood

Meeting for 2018-07-24

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Agenda Review
  3. Announcements & Reminders
  4. Progress on Current Action Items
  5. Work Items
  6. Amira Use Case

Meeting for 2018-07-17

Topics

  1. Agenda Review and Introductions
  2. Roadmap
  3. DID WG Charter

Meeting for 2018-07-10

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Announcements and Reminders
  3. uPort Ethereum DID Method

Meeting for 2018-07-03

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Transparency
  3. Announcements and Reminders
  4. Action Items
  5. Work Items
  6. Focal Use Cases
  7. DID-Auth

Meeting for 2018-06-26

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Agenda Review
  3. Announcements & Reminders
  4. Progress on Current Action Items
  5. Work Items
  6. Focal Use Cases for DID WG
  7. Muscians and Influencers

Meeting for 2018-06-19

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements and Reminders
  3. Action Items
  4. Work Items
  5. Requirements for DIDs

Meeting for 2018-06-12

Topics

  1. Agenda review
  2. Introductions
  3. Announcements
  4. Action items - https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22action+item%22_
  5. Work items
  6. DID Method Requirements?
  7. Focal use cases

Meeting for 2018-06-05

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Announcements and Reminders
  3. Progress on current action items
  4. Status of Work Items
  5. Focal Use Cases for DID WG

Meeting for 2018-05-29

Topics

  1. Introductions and Re-Introductions
  2. Wyoming Blockchain Task Force Meeting
  3. Summer Hackathon
  4. Focal Use Cases

Meeting for 2018-05-22

Topics

  1. Introductions/Re-introductions
  2. Announcements and Reminders
  3. Action Items
  4. Work Items
  5. Update on Educational Task Force
  6. Formation of a User Story Task Force

Meeting for 2018-05-15

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Reminders
  3. Progress on Current Action Items
  4. Status of Work Items
  5. Call for DID Focal Use Cases
  6. DID issues working session
  7. DID service naming and identification
  8. DID Document versioning
  9. Extensibility

Meeting for 2018-05-08

Topics

  1. introductions
  2. action items update
  3. work items
  4. digital verification github items
  5. Digital Verification community items and CCG people
  6. DID Use Cases & Domains

Meeting for 2018-05-01

Topics

  1. Reintroductions
  2. Action Items
  3. DID Working Group Transition

Meeting for 2018-04-24

Topics

  1. CCG Process

Meeting for 2018-04-19

Topics

  1. poll results
  2. Peer claims https://hackmd.io/BYWqUeNDRimyKJL5xsSOiw

Meeting for 2018-04-17

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Announcements
  3. Issues List
  4. ZK Lang

Meeting for 2018-04-10

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Next Week - Crypto Tuesdays - ZKLang
  3. Action Items
  4. MyData Panel at Helsinki
  5. Work items - DID Spec and DID Methods
  6. IIW26 Report Out
  7. Verifiable Claims WG Meeting

Meeting for 2018-04-05

Topics

  1. Occupational and Educational Credentials

Meeting for 2018-03-27

Topics

  1. Introductions / ReIntroductions
  2. Education Credentials Task Force
  3. https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community
  4. DID Auth Follow-up

Meeting for 2018-03-22

Topics

  1. Occupational/Educational Task Force

Meeting for 2018-03-20

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Announcements
  3. Current action items progress
  4. Work items
  5. DID-based Authentication (DID-Auth)

Meeting for 2018-03-13

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Announcements
  3. Report from Rebooting the Web of Trust 6

Meeting for 2018-02-15

Topics

  1. DID Service URLs
  2. Other DID Spec Items

Meeting for 2018-02-13

Topics

  1. Announcements
  2. DID Authentication
  3. Object Capabilities

Resolutions

  1. Create an Education and Occupational Credentials Task Force as described in https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2018Feb/0013.html
  2. Adopt the Linked Data Object Capabilities specification as a work item.

Meeting for 2018-02-06

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Announcements
  3. DID Specification Reconciliation
  4. Crypto Tuesdays
  5. Cryptography Suite Implementations

Meeting for 2018-01-30

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Agenda for Today
  3. Action Items
  4. CG Process
  5. Data Minimization
  6. Education Task Force

Resolutions

  1. Merge PR 41 into the main specification based on no objections, we have achieved consensus on this PR.

Meeting for 2018-01-25

Topics

  1. DID Harmonization PR
  2. Encryption
  3. DID Fragment Identifiers

Meeting for 2018-01-23

Topics

  1. Introduction to Akila
  2. Announcements, Focus for 2018
  3. DID Harmonization
  4. DID Hackathon Outcomes

Meeting for 2018-01-16

Topics

  1. Reintroductions
  2. Announcements
  3. Work Items
  4. Outreach
  5. Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) aka Roadmap Review

Meeting for 2018-01-11

Topics

  1. DID Harmonization
  2. Spec Updates

Meeting for 2018-01-09

Topics

  1. Reintroduction for Kerri Lemoie
  2. Announcements
  3. Progress on current action items
  4. DID Harmonization Proposal #1
  5. Outreach

Meeting for 2018-01-04

Topics

  1. Biometric Authentication
  2. DID Spec Scope?
  3. DID Document Extensibility
  4. Fundamental DID Architecture

Meeting for 2017-12-21

Topics

  1. Cryptographic Key Material

Meeting for 2017-12-19

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Announcements and Status Updates
  3. 2017 Year in Review

Meeting for 2017-12-14

Topics

  1. Current Status of DID Hardening Discussions
  2. Options for Keys / Authentication
  3. Option #D

Resolutions

  1. Eliminate Option #3 from the discussion choices as described in this email: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2017Dec/0046.html

Meeting for 2017-12-12

Topics

  1. Introductions / Reintroductions
  2. Announcements
  3. Status of Work Items
  4. engagement model
  5. browser api and polyfill
  6. privacy and security requirements
  7. DID Spec Change Requests
  8. Other Topics

Meeting for 2017-12-07

Topics

  1. Intellectual Property Release
  2. Two Stages of DID Document
  3. Simple Arrays of Key Descriptions

Meeting for 2017-12-05

Topics

  1. Agenda Review
  2. Announcements
  3. Introductions
  4. W3C CCG Process Document
  5. W3C Intellectual Property Requirements & our CG Process
  6. CCG Registries

Meeting for 2017-11-30

Topics

  1. DID Hardening Proposal v3
  2. Format Independence
  3. Optional ID Property for the DID

Meeting for 2017-11-14

Topics

  1. Introduction to Mark Miller (Google)
  2. DID Spec Review
  3. Capabilities in Verifiable Credentials
  4. W3C TPAC 2017 Update

Meeting for 2017-10-31

Topics

  1. Status of Action Items
  2. Credential Handler API
  3. W3C TPAC Planning
  4. Post RWoT DID Spec

Meeting for 2017-10-24

Topics

  1. Reintroductions
  2. W3C TPAC
  3. DID Specification
  4. Digital Verification Cryptography
  5. JSON-LD and LD Signature Updates
  6. Credential Handler API
  7. Lifecycle Model
  8. Verifiable News
  9. Other Work Items
  10. Path for DID Spec Standardization

Meeting for 2017-10-17

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. New DID Spec PR
  3. Verifiable News
  4. W3C TPAC Planning

Meeting for 2017-09-26

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Action Items
  3. Credential Handler Polyfill Video
  4. Data Minimization & Selective Disclosure
  5. DID Specification
  6. Next week

Meeting for 2017-09-19

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Proposed changes to DID Spec Overview
  3. DID Spec Discussion

Meeting for 2017-09-12

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Action Items
  3. Proofs vs. Signatures
  4. Capabilities-based Security Model

Meeting for 2017-09-05

Topics

  1. Agenda Review
  2. Introductions / Re-introductions
  3. Action Item Review
  4. ActivityPub and Mastadon
  5. DID Specification

Meeting for 2017-08-29

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Work Item Progress
  3. Privacy and Security Requirements
  4. DID Specification Progress

Meeting for 2017-08-22

Topics

  1. Administrivia - Dialing In
  2. Introductions
  3. Mission Statement Review
  4. Credential Handler API (and polyfill)

Meeting for 2017-08-15

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Fake News and Bots
  3. Mission Statement
  4. Administrative Items

Meeting for 2017-08-08

Topics

  1. Introductions and Reintroductions
  2. Agenda Review
  3. Mission Statement

Meeting for 2017-08-01

Topics

  1. Action Items
  2. Introductions and Re-introductions
  3. Update on Community Group Name
  4. Revising the Mission Statement

Meeting for 2017-07-25

Topics

  1. Re-Introductions
  2. Action Items
  3. DID Specification Work Item
  4. Lifecycle Deep Dive

Resolutions

  1. Accept the DID Specification as a Credentials CG work item.

Meeting for 2017-07-18

Topics

  1. Introduction to Lionel Walberger
  2. Action Items
  3. DID Specification update
  4. Cryptography for Anonymous Credentials

Meeting for 2017-06-27

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Selective Disclosure and CL Signatures

Meeting for 2017-06-20

Topics

  1. Bitcoin DID Method (BTCR)
  2. Chainpoint v3.0
  3. Linked Data Signatures

Meeting for 2017-06-13

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Action Items
  3. Community Group Naming
  4. Interaction with Banking/Finance Industry
  5. Planning for W3C TPAC
  6. Work Item Review
  7. RDF Dataset Canonicalization
  8. Privacy and Security Requirements

Meeting for 2017-06-06

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Agenda Review
  3. Action Items
  4. Current Polls
  5. Decentralized Identifiers
  6. Reputation Systems
  7. Next Meeting

Meeting for 2017-05-30

Topics

  1. Community Group Scope and Naming
  2. Verifiable Claims Browser API and Browser Polyfill
  3. Lifecycle of a Verifiable Claim
  4. Data Minimization and Selective Disclosure Report
  5. Decentralized Identifier Spec

Meeting for 2017-05-23

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Action Item Review
  3. Future Work Items Discussion

Meeting for 2017-05-16

Topics

  1. Introduce New Chairs
  2. New Members
  3. Review of Credentails CG Mission Statement
  4. Community Group Priorities
  5. Potential Work Items

Meeting for 2017-05-09

Topics

  1. Agenda Review and Introductions
  2. WG Document Handoff
  3. Joining the VCWG
  4. Reminder: this is last CG call at this time
  5. Open Mic / Community Group Next Steps
  6. CG and WG call next week

Meeting for 2017-05-02

Topics

  1. Finalize CG Reports, hand-off to WG
  2. Trip Reports
  3. Working Group Membership
  4. Suggestions for next week

Resolutions

  1. Publish 2017-05-01 drafts as Final Reports. Gather feedback until this coming Friday, and publish final specifications if no objections.

Meeting for 2017-03-14

Topics

  1. Agenda review and Introductions
  2. Status of Verifiable Claims WG Creation
  3. No meeting on 3/28 (reminder)
  4. DO_NOT_CORRELATE flag discussion
  5. WoT use case
  6. Action Item Review (https://goo.gl/V4XTBT)
  7. Suggestions for next week agenda

Meeting for 2017-03-07

Topics

  1. Status of VCWG Creation
  2. Meeting for 2017-03-28 Cancelled
  3. IMS Badge Summit Update
  4. RWoT Demo Status
  5. Prioritizing Pull Requests
  6. Actions Item Review
  7. amigus email re: privacy: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-credentials/2017Mar/0002.html
  8. Suggestions for Next Meeting Agenda

Meeting for 2017-02-28

Topics

  1. Introduction to Kim Duffy from BlockCerts
  2. Status of Verifiable Claims WG Creation
  3. Update on Verifiable Claims Playground
  4. Action Item Review
  5. Agenda for Next Week

Meeting for 2017-02-21

Topics

  1. Introduction to Sean Bohan
  2. Status of WG Creation
  3. Action Item Review
  4. Face to Face Meetings
  5. Requirements
  6. Correlatability of Usage Patterns
  7. Primary or Secondary Subject

Meeting for 2017-02-14

Topics

  1. Introduction to Abbas Ali from R3
  2. Status of Verifiable Claims WG Creation
  3. Sandbox for the implementers to work on
  4. Action Item Review
  5. Face to Face Meeting Opportunities
  6. Portable Reputation Kit

Meeting for 2017-02-07

Topics

  1. Agenda Review and Introductions
  2. Status of Verifiable Claims WG Creation
  3. Status of Face to Face in March
  4. Action Item Review
  5. Discuss work on requirements gathering
  6. Use Case Issue 18: Holder Terminology
  7. Use Case Issue 34: Lifecycle Engagement - next steps

Resolutions

  1. Do not close yet Issue 18 yet.

Meeting for 2017-01-31

Topics

  1. Agenda Review and Introductions
  2. Status of Verifiable Claims WG creation
  3. Possible VCWG F2F week of March 21st 2017
  4. Use Cases Framework Discussion

Meeting for 2017-01-24

Topics

  1. Agenda Review
  2. Status of Verifiable Claims WG Vote
  3. Use Cases Narratives and Revocation/Privacy
  4. Correlation Analysis and Prevention
  5. Filtering, Focusing use cases

Meeting for 2017-01-17

Topics

  1. Agenda review and Introductions
  2. Status of Verifiable Claims WG Vote
  3. Web of Trust Use Case
  4. Prioritization of/response to privacy concerns

Meeting for 2017-01-10

Topics

  1. Vote for Verifiable Claims WG
  2. Use Cases Document Update
  3. Agenda Items for Next Week

Meeting for 2016-12-20

Topics

  1. Introduction to Pari, from Intuit
  2. Agenda Review
  3. Verifiable Claims WG Vote
  4. Discussion on Github
  5. Intro to Github Pull Requests
  6. Use of WebIDL in the Spec

Meeting for 2016-12-13

Topics

  1. Vote for Verifiable Claims WG is Open
  2. Reference Libraries
  3. Use of JSON/JSON-LD in spec
  4. Next Meeting

Meeting for 2016-12-06

Topics

  1. Introduction to John Koshy
  2. Rebooting Web of Trust, Paris
  3. Issue Prioritization
  4. Use of JSON/JSON-LD in spec

Meeting for 2016-11-29

Topics

  1. Agenda review
  2. New Participants
  3. New Location for Specs
  4. Status of W3M Charter Review
  5. Call for review
  6. Brief review of adding issues in GitHub
  7. Nesting Signatures with JWT

Meeting for 2016-11-15

Topics

  1. W3C AB Feedback
  2. Specific Use Cases
  3. Age Verification Use Case
  4. Spec Issues

Meeting for 2016-11-08

Topics

  1. Gathering More Use Case Data

Meeting for 2016-11-01

Topics

  1. Rebooting Web of Trust
  2. Internet Identity Workshop #23
  3. Verifiable Claims Face-to-Face
  4. Intro to Phil Archer from W3C
  5. Responses to VC Concerns

Meeting for 2016-10-28

Topics

  1. Agenda Review
  2. Long-term Architectural Concerns
  3. Decentralized Identifiers
  4. Start of Data Model Deep Dive
  5. Data Model Deep Dive
  6. Digital Signatures
  7. Responding to Charter Review Comments

Meeting for 2016-10-27

Topics

  1. Welcome and Administrivia
  2. Introduction to Use Cases
  3. Good Use Cases
  4. Education Industry Use Cases
  5. Healthcare Use Cases
  6. Payments Use Cases
  7. Verifiable Claims Proposed Architecture / Goals
  8. Data model and Representation Overview
  9. The W3C Process
  10. VCF2F Day Two Agenda Bash

Meeting for 2016-10-11

Topics

  1. Verifiable Claims Face-to-Face Agenda
  2. architecture (shane)
  3. data model, representations (manu) - day 1 will feel repetitive b/c there will be ~50% newcomers

Meeting for 2016-10-04

Topics

  1. After Action Report - W3C TPAC
  2. Registering for VC Face-to-Face
  3. Verifiable Claims Face-to-Face Agenda
  4. Feedback on W3C Verifiable Claims Announcement

Meeting for 2016-09-06

Topics

  1. Quick introduction from Pindar Wong
  2. F2F Meeting at IIW
  3. Verifiable Claims Implementations to Demo
  4. Verifiable Claims RC-2 Draft Charter Feedback
  5. Estonian E-Residency Face-to-Face
  6. Planning for W3C TPAC
  7. Interplanetary File System and Verifiable Claims

Meeting for 2016-08-16

Topics

  1. Introduction to Bob Burke, Koupon Media
  2. Introduction to Adrian Gropper, HealthURL
  3. Verifiable Claims Face-to-Face at IIW
  4. Verifiable Claims RC-2 Draft Charter
  5. IPFS and Verifiable Claims

Meeting for 2016-08-02

Topics

  1. Feedback on Charter from W3C Management
  2. Verifiable Claims Face-to-Face Agenda
  3. Terminology and Expiration
  4. Linked Data Encrypted Signatures

Meeting for 2016-07-19

Topics

  1. Review All Dissenting Opinions
  2. JOSE / JWT Clarification/Analysis
  3. Verifiable Claims Face-to-Face Agenda
  4. Coordinating with Other Workshops

Meeting for 2016-07-12

Topics

  1. Verifiable Claims Presentation at WPIG face-to-face
  2. Identified Verifiable Claims "Weak Points"
  3. Next Steps

Meeting for 2016-06-21

Topics

  1. Verifiable Claims Working Group Proposal
  2. Terminology Results
  3. Data Model Specification
  4. Use Cases
  5. Next Steps

Meeting for 2016-06-14

Topics

  1. Terminology Poll
  2. Implementer Commitment Summary
  3. Verifiable Claims Architecture
  4. Primer
  5. Data Model Specification
  6. Use Cases
  7. Items that are "Good Enough" for Review

Meeting for 2016-06-08

Topics

  1. Discuss purpose of architecture proposal
  2. Analysis of current document
  3. Identifier registry
  4. Repository
  5. Simplifying Diagram

Meeting for 2016-06-07

Topics

  1. VCTF Deliverables
  2. Verifiable Claims Use Cases Review
  3. Verifiable Claims Charter
  4. Verifiable Claims Charter FAQ
  5. Architecture Summary
  6. Verifiable Claims Data Model Specification
  7. Terminology Conflicts
  8. Other items

Resolutions

  1. Adopt self-sovereign terminology over user-centric terminology.

Meeting for 2016-05-31

Topics

  1. Introduction to New Participants
  2. Self-Sovereign Identity Architecture
  3. Decentralized Identifiers
  4. Verifiable Claims Use Cases Review
  5. Update on Work Items

Meeting for 2016-05-24

Topics

  1. Introductions to New Participants
  2. Agenda Bashing
  3. Introduction to Anil John and DHS Blockchain R&D
  4. Other Introductions
  5. United Nations ID2020 Summit Recap
  6. Rebooting Web of Trust Design Workshop Recap
  7. Recent Vermont Legal Finding
  8. Update on Work Items

Meeting for 2016-05-17

Topics

  1. Introduction to Alka Gupta from GlobalID
  2. Blockchain and Identity
  3. Verifiable Claims Data Model Specification
  4. Credentials Transparency Initiative Terminology
  5. Target Date Web Payments IG Hand-off

Resolutions

  1. Augment the "Credential" terminology in the specification with a modifier like "OpenCredential" or "IdentityCredential" or "VerifiableCredential".

Meeting for 2016-05-10

Topics

  1. Introduction to Alok from Cambridge Blockchain
  2. Review of Survey Status
  3. Work on Existing Docs
  4. Verifiable Claims Data Model Specification
  5. Survey Results/Overview
  6. One page W3C AC Rep Summary
  7. Architecture Summary
  8. Implementers Summary

Meeting for 2016-04-26

Topics

  1. Credentials Transparency Initiative Alignment
  2. Review of Questionnaire Status
  3. Verifiable Claims Data Model Specification
  4. One page W3C AC Rep Summary
  5. Charter Cleanup
  6. Use Case Reviews

Meeting for 2016-04-19

Topics

  1. Introductions to New Participants
  2. United Nations ID2020 Initiative
  3. Review of Questionnaire Responses
  4. Work Items

Meeting for 2016-04-05

Topics

  1. Introduction to Christopher Allen
  2. Blockchain Interest in Identity Credentials
  3. Review of Questionnaire
  4. Charter Review To Date
  5. Options Moving Forward

Meeting for 2016-03-29

Topics

  1. Introduction to Todd Albers
  2. W3C Advisory Committee Summary
  3. Next Steps (in the next 4-6 weeks)
  4. Spec Ops

Meeting for 2016-03-15

Topics

  1. Draft Charter Proposal
  2. Use Cases Document
  3. Card for AC Meeting
  4. Vocabulary changes - Issuer, Curator, Inspector

Resolutions

  1. Integrate as much feedback as possible before 3pm today and send the editor's draft charter and use cases out for informal review to the interviewees, the survey respondents, and the W3C Advisory Committee.

Meeting for 2016-03-08

Topics

  1. Draft Charter Proposal
  2. Material for W3C Advisory Committe Meeting at MIT
  3. Use Cases Document
  4. Expected Timeline for VCTF Charter Review

Meeting for 2016-03-01

Topics

  1. Review Web Payments IG Vote on VCTF
  2. Next Steps (W3C AC Meeting)
  3. Draft Charter Proposal
  4. Use Cases Document

Meeting for 2016-02-19

Topics

  1. Current Status
  2. Use Cases Document
  3. Verifiable Claims Task Force Presentation
  4. Verifiable Claims Task Force Final Report
  5. Draft Charter Proposal

Meeting for 2016-02-12

Topics

  1. Background on Jeanne, Bob, and the Credentials Transparency Initiative
  2. Problem Statement
  3. Data Format
  4. Technical Advisory Committee on Metadata
  5. Need for Credentials Technology

Meeting for 2016-02-09

Topics

  1. Plan to Finishing up Interviews
  2. Verifiable Claims Task Force Final Report
  3. Use Cases Document
  4. Draft Charter Proposal

Meeting for 2016-02-02

Topics

  1. Summary of Interviews So Far
  2. Documents Needed By Web Payments Face-to-Face
  3. Verifiable Claims Task Force Final Report
  4. Use Cases Document
  5. Draft Charter Proposal

Meeting for 2016-01-29-2

Topics

  1. Introduction
  2. Problem Statement
  3. Level of assurance, Level of protection, and Level of control
  4. The Problem with User-Centric
  5. Important Trust Models
  6. OpenID, SAML, and Privacy
  7. Potential Standardization Opportunities
  8. Best Place for Standardization Work

Meeting for 2016-01-29-1

Topics

  1. Problem Statement
  2. User-centric Design vs Privacy-centric Design
  3. OpenID Connect, SAML, and OAuth
  4. Useful Technology Pieces
  5. The Work on OpenID
  6. The Best Mode for a Solution

Meeting for 2016-01-28

Topics

  1. Problem Statement
  2. Stakeholders and Benefits
  3. SAML, Oauth, OpenID Connect, and JOSE
  4. Important Work Items
  5. Best Location for Standards Work

Meeting for 2016-01-27

Topics

  1. Problem Statement
  2. OpenID Connect
  3. Definitions and User-Centric vs. Service-Centric
  4. Respect Network
  5. Portable Identifiers
  6. Ideal Place for Work

Meeting for 2016-01-26

Topics

  1. Interview Narratives So Far
  2. Responding to Identified Narratives
  3. Draft Charter Proposal
  4. Use Cases Document

Meeting for 2016-01-19

Topics

  1. Update on Past and Upcoming Interviews
  2. Plan (or lack thereof) for Face-to-Face in February
  3. Stalled Work

Meeting for 2016-01-08

Topics

  1. Verifiable Claims Problem Statement
  2. Anti-Fraud / Anti-Abuse
  3. Revocation / Status Checking
  4. Slow Evolution of Agent-Centric Protocols
  5. Trust and Semantics

Meeting for 2016-01-05

Topics

  1. Background on Verifiable Claims work
  2. Problem Statement and Scope
  3. Key Questions
  4. The Interviews

Meeting for 2015-12-15

Topics

  1. Introduction of New Participants
  2. Review Deliverables
  3. Review Milestones / Timelines
  4. Review Benefits for Stakeholders

Resolutions

  1. Request that the Web Payments Interest Group approve the Verifiable Claims Task Force with the caveat that we still need to do interviews before finalizing work and problem statement.
  2. Adopt the Deliverables in the VCTF wiki as they stand today.
  3. Adopt the Milestones / Timeline as it stands today in the wiki.
  4. Adopt the benefits as they stand now in the wiki with the understanding that we may come back and revise the list as we learn more over the next couple of months.

Meeting for 2015-12-08

Topics

  1. Introductions to New Participants
  2. Review of Scope
  3. Review Stakeholders
  4. Review Task Force Operation
  5. Review Success Criteria
  6. Next Steps

Resolutions

  1. Adopt the Scope statement as it exists in the Task Force Proposal wiki.
  2. Adopt the Stakeholders section as it stands in the wiki.
  3. Adopt the Task Force Operation section as it stands in the wiki.
  4. Adopt the success criteria as it stands in the wiki.

Meeting for 2015-12-01

Topics

  1. Introduction of Participants
  2. Review the purpose of the call
  3. Review Goals
  4. Review Weekly Meetings
  5. Review Definitions
  6. Review Problem Statement

Resolutions

  1. Adopt the goals statement as it exists in the Verifiable Claims Task Force Proposal.
  2. Adopt the weekly telecon format, tools, and time listed here http://w3c.github.io/vctf/#telecons with fixes to the URLs pointed out by Dave Longley.
  3. There is a significant difference between user-centric and service-centric architectures when it comes to verifiable claims.
  4. Adopt the definitions as they stand in the Verifiable Claims Task Force Proposal.
  5. Adopt the Problem Statement in the Verifiable Claims Task Force Proposal with the changes made during the call today.

Meeting for 2015-11-24

Topics

  1. Introduction to Dan Burnett
  2. WPIG / Verifiable Claims After Action Review
  3. Goals for Next Week's Meeting
  4. Administrivia for Next Week's Meeting

Meeting for 2015-11-17

Topics

  1. Current Status of Task Force Proposal
  2. Focus on Use Cases
  3. ToDo Items

Meeting for 2015-11-10

Topics

  1. Credentials Task Force in WPIG Update
  2. Tasks for Credentials CG
  3. Linked Data Fast Track WG Update

Meeting for 2015-11-03

Topics

  1. Introductions to New Participants
  2. Work Generated as a Result of W3C TPAC
  3. WebDHT Spec Released
  4. Reorganizing this group around new Task Force

Meeting for 2015-10-20

Topics

  1. W3C TPAC Credentials Presentation
  2. Introduction to Rebecca Simmons
  3. Introduction to Deb Everhart
  4. Linked Data Signatures Update
  5. HTTP Signatures Update

Meeting for 2015-10-13

Topics

  1. NACS Show
  2. HTTP Signatures
  3. Introductions to New Members
  4. W3C TPAC Credentials DRAFT Presentation
  5. Credentials Reference Implementation Demo
  6. Post-meeting Discussion

Meeting for 2015-10-06

Topics

  1. Current state of Credentials Survey
  2. Survey Outreach
  3. Upcoming Demos
  4. Lumina Meeting Review

Meeting for 2015-08-25

Topics

  1. Recruiting
  2. Standards Implementation Foundation
  3. Update from IMS Global
  4. Capabilities Wrap-up

Meeting for 2015-08-18

Topics

  1. Recruiting
  2. IMS Global Update
  3. Capabilities Document

Meeting for 2015-08-11

Topics

  1. Introduction to Annie Jenssen
  2. Recruiting
  3. Roadmap
  4. Credentialing Capabilities and Current Proposal

Meeting for 2015-08-04

Topics

  1. Recruiting
  2. Glossary Document
  3. Vision document

Meeting for 2015-07-28

Topics

  1. Recruiting
  2. Glossary Document
  3. Vision Document

Meeting for 2015-07-21

Topics

  1. Introduction to Andrew
  2. Introduction to John Tibbetts
  3. Recruiting
  4. Vision
  5. Glossary
  6. Use Cases
  7. Capabilities
  8. Roadmap

Meeting for 2015-07-14

Topics

  1. Introduction to Brendan Benshoof
  2. Recruiting
  3. Producing Documents
  4. Vision document
  5. Use Cases
  6. Capabilities
  7. Roadmap

Meeting for 2015-07-07

Topics

  1. Recruiting
  2. authorization.io
  3. Decentralized Identifiers

Meeting for 2015-06-30

Topics

  1. Credentials WG Plan
  2. Introductions of New Members
  3. Recruiting

Meeting for 2015-06-23

Topics

  1. Web Payments IG face-to-face in NYC
  2. Introduction to Matt Stone
  3. Current Status of Credentials at W3C
  4. Badge Alliance updates
  5. Focus on Recruiting New Members

Meeting for 2015-06-09

Topics

  1. Web Payments IG and Credentials

Meeting for 2015-06-02

Topics

  1. Credentials WG Charter and WPIG
  2. Recruiting document
  3. Credential Management API update
  4. Use Cases

Meeting for 2015-05-26

Topics

  1. Recruiting document (non-W3C member)
  2. Introduction to James and Arto
  3. Graph Normalization Update
  4. Recruiting W3C Members
  5. Credential Management API Extension (update)
  6. Use Cases

Meeting for 2015-05-19

Topics

  1. Introduction to Jordan Windsor
  2. Open Badges xsd:string issue
  3. WebAppSec Credential Management API
  4. Graph Normalization Test Suite
  5. Community Group Focus

Meeting for 2015-05-12

Topics

  1. Recap of 2015 Groningen Declaration Meeting
  2. OBI JSON-LD Context
  3. RDF Graph Normalization
  4. Credentials WG Charter on Web Payments Agenda
  5. Credentials WG support questionnaire
  6. Recruiting co-chair from Pearson

Meeting for 2015-05-05

Topics

  1. Introduction to Richard Varn
  2. Open Badges 1.1 Release
  3. 2015 Groningen Declaration Meeting
  4. WebAppSec Credential Management API Status Update
  5. Level One Project
  6. Credentials WG Charter on Web Payments Agenda
  7. Next Steps

Meeting for 2015-04-14

Topics

  1. Use Cases
  2. WebAppSec Credential Management API
  3. Credentials/Badges Vocabulary Update

Resolutions

  1. Switch the primary use cases document over to the micro-use cases approach, concentrate all future use case work into that document.

Meeting for 2015-04-07

Topics

  1. Executive Summary
  2. Use Cases
  3. Credentials/Badges Vocabulary Update

Meeting for 2015-03-31

Topics

  1. W3C Interest in Credentials WG
  2. Executive Summary
  3. Use Cases
  4. Credentials/Badges Vocabulary Update
  5. Roadmap

Meeting for 2015-03-10

Topics

  1. Teleconference Bridge
  2. Credentials Working Group Charter
  3. Use Cases / Linked Data Signatures
  4. Credentials/Badges Vocabulary Update
  5. Roadmap Update

Meeting for 2015-03-03

Topics

  1. Credentials Working Group Charter
  2. Use Cases
  3. Profile Use Cases
  4. Linked Data Signatures spec
  5. Credentials/Badges Vocabulary Update

Meeting for 2015-02-10

Topics

  1. Introduction to Laura Fowler
  2. Introduction to Brent Shambaugh
  3. Web Payments IG Face-to-Face
  4. Decentralized Identifiers for Credentials/Badges
  5. Signatures Update
  6. Badge Alliance Context/Vocabulary Update
  7. Roadmap Update

Meeting for 2015-01-27

Topics

  1. Signatures Update
  2. Badges/Credentials Vocabulary and Context
  3. Digital Promise Summit for Workforce

Meeting for 2015-01-20

Topics

  1. Bedrock / P3 Release
  2. Credentials / Web Payments IG Agenda
  3. Signatures Update
  4. Badge Alliance Vocabulary/Context Update
  5. Roadmap

Meeting for 2015-01-13

Topics

  1. Web Payments Face-to-Face
  2. Linked Data Signatures
  3. JSON-LD Credentials Context/Vocabulary Update
  4. Roadmap Update

Meeting for 2014-12-09

Topics

  1. Introduction to elf Pavlik
  2. Signatures Update
  3. Context Work Stream Update
  4. Roadmap Work Stream update
  5. Hosted vs. Signed

Meeting for 2014-12-02

Topics

  1. Coordination Plan for Next Few Months
  2. Path Forward for Digital Signatures
  3. Moving CG Documents onto REC-track at W3C

Meeting for 2014-11-25

Topics

  1. Digital Signatures - Pushback from Social Web / Harry Halpin
  2. Introduction to Dale McCrory
  3. Digital Signature Strategy

Meeting for 2014-11-18

Topics

  1. Groningen Declaration
  2. Digital Signatures for Credentials

Meeting for 2014-11-11

Topics

  1. Review W3C TPAC Meeting
  2. Web Payments IG Meeting
  3. W3C TPAC Credentials Hallway Discussions
  4. Planning for next 2 months

Meeting for 2014-10-28

Topics

  1. Introduction
  2. Identity Proofing
  3. Scope of CG Work
  4. Use Cases / Future Work
  5. Identifier Portability
  6. Data Rights, Legacy Support

Meeting for 2014-10-21

Topics

  1. Intro from Dale McCrory from Courseload
  2. Introduction to Nate Otto from Concentric Sky
  3. Review Credentials CG Presentation to Web Payments IG
  4. Review Credentials CG F2F Agenda
  5. Review Credentials Use Cases vote status
  6. Open Badges and JSON-LD

Meeting for 2014-10-14

Topics

  1. W3C TPAC and Credentials CG
  2. Credentials CG Use Cases Review
  3. Start Discussing Roadmap Document

Resolutions

  1. Publish a preliminary Credentials Use Cases document and vote on publishing it as a first public working draft before W3C TPAC. Start the vote at 5pm ET on Tuesday October 14th 2014 and keep it open for 7 days.

Meeting for 2014-10-07

Topics

  1. Voting Process on Credentials Use Case Document
  2. Web Payments Agenda on CG call last week
  3. Comments on Use Cases Document
  4. Remaining Use Cases
  5. Verifiable Claims
  6. Media Rights
  7. Data Rights
  8. Proof of Pseudo-anonymity
  9. Data Rights Agreement Before Transmission of Data
  10. Access Revocation
  11. Access Audit
  12. Access Credential Audit Information
  13. Education Use Cases
  14. Access to Transcripts
  15. Online Transcript
  16. Continuing Education
  17. University Credits
  18. Bachelor's Degree
  19. Any other use cases?

Resolutions

  1. Create and publish a preliminary Credentials Use Cases document and vote on publishing it as a first public working draft before W3C TPAC. Give fair notice of the vote immediately, start the vote at the end of the day on Tuesday October 14th 2014 and keep it open for 7 days.

Meeting for 2014-09-30

Topics

  1. Web Payments Use Cases Vote
  2. Register Now for W3C TPAC
  3. Advanced Use Cases (Tim Holborn)
  4. Offer use case
  5. Proof of Contribution Use Case
  6. Proof of Invention Use Case
  7. Wrapping up Use Cases

Meeting for 2014-09-23

Topics

  1. Complete Web Payments Use Case Review
  2. Identity Recovery
  3. Use Cases from Tim Holborn
  4. Generalized Credentials
  5. Read/Write Permissions
  6. Proof of Delivery
  7. Sharing Private Data
  8. Credential-based Access
  9. Confidential Sharing/Agreement
  10. Advertising and Data Rights
  11. Credentials for Internet of Things

Meeting for 2014-09-16

Topics

  1. W3C TPAC Preparation
  2. Mark as Liason to IMS Global and PESC
  3. Charter Vote Result
  4. Web Payments Use Case Review

Meeting for 2014-09-09

Topics

  1. Introduction of new Members
  2. Quick IGF 2014 Review
  3. Badge Alliance and JSON-LD Discussion
  4. Charter Vote Status
  5. Use Case Review

Meeting for 2014-08-26

Topics

  1. Introductions
  2. Overview of W3C Community Group Process
  3. Charter Review
  4. Questions Related to CG Operation
  5. Use Case Review

Resolutions

  1. Hold a vote on the Credentials CG Charter starting Friday, August 29th 2014 with the vote open for 2 weeks. Accept the charter if 2/3rds majority of votes cast are in favor.